Why data center boom needs urgent regulation

Valued at roughly $300bn in 2024 by TMT Finance, the global data center market is on a meteoric trajectory toward a trillion-dollar valuation over the next decade. As the world’s top economies race to secure the physical infrastructure undergirding the Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution, Nepal is quietly stepping onto the track. This August, the country is set to welcome its first Tier IV data center, the highest global standard for digital uptime and infrastructure. 

Yet, unlike its international peers, Nepal is racing blindly into this race without a unified regulatory safety net. While the government unveiled the Data Center and Cloud Services Directive in 2025 to ease the operation, existing policies fundamentally lack environmental accountability. Anyone who has closely studied the global expansion of data centers knows this regulatory vacuum is a recipe for local disaster. 

The environmental externalities of these facilities are staggering. Recognizing the strain, governments worldwide are stepping in with targeted regulatory frameworks. For example, the European Union has established overriding policies mandating ‘Ecodesign’ regulations to curb design-phase energy use, alongside strict transparency laws under the Energy Efficiency Directive (EED). Singapore, fully aware of its land and water constraints, enforced a strict, integrated regulatory framework, going so far as to halt new data center approvals entirely for a period to evaluate resource strain. 

Closer to home, South Asian models offer a cautionary tale. For instance, India lacks a binding national environmental framework for data centers, leaving development to an ‘incentive-driven’ state model rather than integrated national resource planning. 

Nepal’s digital journey began in 2009 when the government established the Government Integrated Data Center (GIDC) with South Korean assistance. Since then, telecom giants like NTC and Ncell, alongside internet service providers like Worldlink, have scaled up their private infrastructure. 

On paper, this is a massive win. Nepal sits strategically between two of the world’s largest digital economies. With a growing installed electricity capacity, naturally cool environments, and strategic geographic positioning, Nepal is an ideal candidate to become a localized regional data routing hub. The economic promises are vast. But in our rush to build the cloud, we are ignoring the ground and the massive toll on our water resources. 

Hyperscale data centers require millions of liters of water annually for evaporative cooling systems. According to an analysis published by the Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI), a medium-sized facility consumes roughly 110m gallons of water annually, while large-scale hyperscale centers can drink up to 5m gallons per day. In a nation already plagued by systemic urban water scarcity, introducing these resource hogs without strict oversight is dangerous. The Digital Nepal Framework 2019, despite its mention of "green" technologies, lacks any frameworks for water usage. Furthermore, Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) are not yet legally mandated for data centers unless triggered by some project dimensions.

This regulatory gap is already hitting communities in different ways. In Nakkhu, Lalitpurb, neighboring residents have protested against existing data center installations, citing nighttime industrial noise, intense heat dissipation, and generator soot. If left unchecked, Nepal will soon face its own wave of the global ‘NIMBY’ (Not In My Backyard) protests that have forced tech titans like Meta and Google to withdraw projects in the West. 

Digital growth doesn’t have to come with ecological damage. To compete sustainably in the global sovereign AI race, Nepal can adopt a three-pronged regulatory approach. First, we must establish a Unified framework; concerned ministries must mandate specific usage metrics like Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) and Water Usage Effectiveness (WUE). Secondly, annual sustainability reporting should be mandated for facilities operating above a specific energy threshold. Third, the government must assess how many data centers our national grid and local water tables can sustainably support and hard cap expansion beyond that threshold. 

Data commercialization could be the bedrock of Nepal’s digital sovereignty. But if we do not regulate its thirst today, the infrastructure built to secure our future will end up draining our resources.