Submit your Article

Today is the International Day against Nuclear Tests. 

On December 2,  2009, the 64th session of the United Nations General Assembly declared August 29 the International Day against Nuclear Tests by unanimously adopting resolution 64/35. 

The resolution calls for increasing awareness and education “about the effects of nuclear weapon test explosions or any other nuclear explosions and the need for their cessation as one of the means of achieving the goal of a nuclear-weapon-free world.” 

At the call of the United Nations, the day has been observed since 2010 to unite the global community against total elimination of nuclear weapons. 

In each subsequent year, the day has been observed by coordinating various activities throughout the world, such as symposia, conferences, exhibits, competitions, publications, lectures, media broadcasts and other initiatives.

In a brief message on the occasion today, Secretary-General of the United Nations Antonio Guterres said the legacy of over 2000 nuclear weapons tests carried out in the past should not be forgotten while marking the 80th anniversary of the first nuclear test and stressed on embracing a world free of nuclear weapons. 

He also emphasized on making promises not to allow repetition of such activities from now onward.

Four youths drowned in the Khutiyakhola (river) at Godawari Municipality in Kailali district on Thursday.

Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) Rana Bahadur Chand of the District Police Office, Kailali identified the deceased as Jabej Bhandari (17) and Jeb Bhandari (15) of Dhangadhi Sub-Metropolitan City-4 and Saksham Joshi (15) and Pratik Chaudhary (17) of ward-5 of Dhangadhi Sub-Metropolitan City. 

DSP Chand said that the bodies of all them were recovered near the incident site. 

However, three other swimmers from the team returned home safely. 

The youths had gone for swimming some 18 kilometres away from Dhangadhi city in the downhill of the Chure region in the Khutiyakhola.

The people from 18-35 years of age would now be defined as youths in the context of Nepal. 

With the recent endorsement of the National Youth Policy-2082, the people of the 18-35 years age would be defined as youths, said Executive Vice-Chairperson of the National Youth Council, Surendra Basnet.

Earlier, the National Youth Policy-2072 had defined youth as those between 16 and 40 years.  The government has formulated a new youth policy. 

As per the National Census 2078, the population of people of 16 to 40 years was 42.56 percent. 

Executive Vice-Chairperson Basnet said a request has been made to calculate the population of youths as per the new youth policy. 

As the Act relating to Children has defined the population up to 18 years as children, the age group of people from 18 to 35 years has been included as youths, he mentioned.  

The United Nations has defined youth as individuals between the 15-24 years. 

Basnet added that the legal age of youths would be 16-40 years until the amendment to National Youth Council Act, 2072. 

Though the youth policy should be revised every five years, it has been amended after 10 years, he argued.

Bijay Bhandari, chairperson of Simkot Rural Municipality in Humla, said, “It has been three years since I assumed this post, but the Chief Administrative Officer has been in my municipality for only nine months. Even now, there is no Chief Administrative Officer in Simkot Rural Municipality.”

There are seven local levels in Humla, but only two—Namkha and Tajkot—currently have Chief Administrative Officers. One of them is seeking a transfer, while the other has already left. “The Ministry of Federal Affairs and General Administration makes the transfers, but officials rarely go to the remote areas where they are posted,” said Bhandari. “There is a tendency to transfer without even reporting to the assigned place. Employees do not want to work in remote areas.”

On Feb 23, Dharmaraj Gaire was transferred to Dipayal as Chief Administrative Officer of Siliguri Municipality. However, he is not there now, and the municipality is being run on an ad hoc basis by Shankar Shuikar. Out of the 39 deputy secretaries promoted on Feb 16, 15 were posted as Chief Administrative Officers in various municipalities and 24 as District Coordination Officers in different District Coordination Committees. But employees are actively working in only six places: Hariban Municipality (Sarlahi), Sankhuwasabha District Coordination, Rolpa District, Shivashatakshi Municipality (Jhapa), Mai Municipality (Ilam), and Duhabi Municipality (Sunsari). Thirty-two employees have already returned to central agencies. The District Coordination Committee in Achham has also been left vacant.

Frequent transfers have further disrupted postings. For instance, Jema Subba, posted to the Sunsari District Coordination Committee on May 22, was transferred to the Ministry of Industry, Commerce and Supplies on July 31. Similarly, Mahesh Subedi, initially posted to the Panchthar District Coordination Committee, was later transferred to Lamjung District Coordination. Recently, officers in the Nepal Administrative Service, General Administration Group—Gazetted Third Class Branch—appointed through the Public Service Commission, were also transferred.

However, many of these employees never reported to the local levels to which they were assigned, such as Aamchowk and Ram Prasad Rai Rural Municipalities in Bhojpur. Some names do not even appear in published transfer lists. While most of those posted on Feb 16, were assigned to District Coordination Committees, their official websites show that only a few new appointees have actually assumed their posts. This reflects a growing problem: civil servants prefer to stay in Kathmandu or other accessible areas, avoiding assignments in municipalities and districts.

Although the Ministry of Federal Affairs and General Administration transfers employees under political pressure and influence, many never reach their destination. Those who do often return within a short time. In some cases, local governments themselves send employees back due to conflicts of interest. There is also a mismatch between officers deputed by the federal government and the expectations of local representatives.

Joint Secretary and Ministry Spokesperson Kali Prasad Parajuli admits it is difficult to retain employees at the local level for political and other reasons. “We are working with chiefs and chairpersons to create an environment where employees can continue serving in the municipalities where they are assigned,” he said.

The recent change of minister has again revived commitments to reform transfer practices. Minister Bhagwati Neupane has promised to make transfers more systematic. Administrative expert Kashiraj Dahal argues that the problem persists because the Federal Civil Service Act has not yet been enacted. “There must be a system where employees report to their assigned posts based on clear criteria, and local governments ensure they assume their duties,” he said. “At present, the ministry does not formulate clear rules, employees avoid postings that are not in their favor, and local governments accept only those employees they prefer. These weaknesses create space for misuse at all levels.”

Former Public Service Commission Chairperson Umesh Prasad Mainali agrees, saying the problem arises because the central government continues to appoint employees, contrary to the spirit of the constitution. “As long as the central government controls appointments, disputes will persist,” he said, adding, “Transfers are frequently made prematurely or even as a form of punishment.”

Currently, around 200 local levels are functioning with acting officials. The government is preparing to fill vacant Chief Administrative Officer positions by reallocating excess employees from other ministries. Minister Neupane has proposed deploying undersecretaries and branch officers—who have been promoted in other ministries but not yet posted at the local level—to fill the gap.

In metropolitan cities, joint secretaries serve as Chief Administrative Officers by position. However, most of the 11 sub-metropolitan cities do not have Chief Administrative Officers as per the post. Except for Jitpur Simara, these positions are being filled by senior or acting officials. According to Parajuli, joint secretaries are posted in metropolitan and sub-metropolitan cities, deputy secretaries in municipalities, and branch officers in rural municipalities. Where there is no Chief Administrative Officer, the senior-most official is serving in an acting capacity.

Currently, there are about 950 deputy secretaries in the general administration group of the civil service. These include Chief Administrative Officers in 276 municipalities, District Coordination Officers, Assistant Chief District Officers, and Chief Land Revenue Officers in 77 districts. Around 400 deputy secretaries are working in ministries, secretariats, commissions, and departments at the center. Yet, most prefer to remain in central postings rather than serve in the field.