Three generations sans citizenship certificates
By Shambhu Yadav | Siraha / Raj Karan Mahato | Mahottari
Dukhani Sadaya from Lahan municipality in the district of Siraha is now 65, an age when she becomes eligible for social security allowance. But she is still struggling to get a citizenship certificate, which is a prerequisite to apply for government services. Her son Rajkumar Sadaya, 35, and daughter-in-law Anita Sadaya, 32, do not have citizenship certificates either. In fact, no one from the Sadaya family has a citizenship card.
Dukhani’s husband Banhu Sadaya, who passed away last year, had knocked on the doors of government offices numerous times to get a citizenship card, but all in vain. Banhu’s father Munar had also faced similar problems, which means the family has been deprived of government services for three generations.
No one from the Sadaya family has a citizenship card
Rajkumar has one daughter, Bhagwati, and two sons, Rakesh and Mukesh. When Rajkumar applied for birth certificates for Bhagwati and Rakesh, the erstwhile Village Development Committee (VDC) did not demand their parents’ citizenship certificates. But the authorities asked for those certificates when Rajkumar applied for a birth certificate for his youngest son Mukesh. Because Mukesh’s parents did not have citizenship cards, he could not get a birth certificate.
Mukesh attends the village’s primary school, but he is not formally enrolled as he does not have a birth certificate. Says Rajkumar, “Even though we have visited various government offices, nothing has come of it. My forefathers could not get citizenship cards, so we are facing difficulties now. The government policies make us feel stateless.”
Rajkumar works as a manual laborer in the construction business. Although he dreams of building his own house with his hard-earned money, it looks unlikely, both because he lacks a citizenship certificate and because what he makes barely covers his household expenses.
In contrast, Kisani Sadaya and Khajani Sadaya from another ward in Lahan municipality received their citizenship certificates in 2006. But because their husbands do not have citizenship cards, their sons could not get birth certificates. As such, they cannot enroll in a school.
Traditionally, members of the Musahar community worked for local landlords, and getting citizenship cards was never an important consideration for them.
“Nobody made them aware about the significance of getting citizenship certificates, so they are facing problems now,” says rights activist Binod Bisuke. He suggests the government carry out a survey of the Musahars and issue citizenship certificates to bona fide citizens.
Chief District Officer Rudra Prasad Pandit says that if anyone presents a document proving that their family has lived in Nepal for three generations, it can be used to support their case for acquiring a citizenship certificate.
On the other hand, 23-year-old Manjaya Sadaya from the district of Mahottari is happy to finally receive his citizenship certificate after struggling to obtain it for six years. “Now I will try to get a government job,” he says elatedly. Earlier, he could not enjoy government services, open a bank account, vote in elections or avail himself of scholarship opportunities because he did not have a card to prove his citizenship.
On the eve of the President’s visit, how is Beijing looking at developments in Nepal?
With the intent of building mutual understanding and developing greater cooperation with their neighbors, the Chinese are proposing a ‘win-win’ formula. Some Chinese officials say, albeit indirectly, that Asia should lead the world. It’s certainly true the Chinese are enjoying rapid prosperity. Driven by feelings of nationalism and ‘Asia first’, they are pursuing development on a war footing. They see all this as a step toward global supremacy.
Based on my conversations with Chinese officials and academics here, I sense that China is hungry for global leadership. To some extent, it has embraced western ways and liberalized its society. Still, Chinese leaders are not used to listening to any kind of criticism. They may not say it, but their displeasure is reflected in their faces.
Claiming they are already established in Europe, America and Africa, the Chinese are now eying the markets of South Asia and West Asia (aka Middle East). To that end, they have chosen Nepal as a ‘launch pad’—even though they accept this is a daunting task. There may be another reason why they picked Nepal. Until recently, the Chinese were aloof with Nepal’s domestic politics, but they are now a force to reckon with in almost every sphere of Nepali politics and economy. The calculation could be that they are well-placed to influence events here.
China has been making a case for greater connectivity between South Asia, South East Asia and other regions through railways. It is actively working on reviving the old Silk Route and connecting with South Asian and South East Asian countries. China’s haste is evident; it wants to rapidly expand its market, and subsequently its supremacy, in these regions.
China intends to enhance regional and global connectivity, which it sees as key to development, through its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).
The trilateral trick
Speaking to some journalists from Nepal, Singapore, The Philippines, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Mongolia and Myanmar in the last week of March, Zhang Zhixin, Division Director of Asian Affairs at China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said his country is keen on promoting mutual collaboration, development, peace and prosperity. He said China is looking to connect with Nepal via railways and expressed his happiness that the project to extend the rail link from Kerung to Kathmandu has been discussed at the highest level. “But such a costly project will not be feasible with grants alone,” he said, while also pointing out the importance of expanding road networks between the two countries.
In reference to the Indo-Pacific Strategy being pushed by the US, Professor Zhu Caihau said China is more concerned about charting its own path than competing with America. “It’s not for China to talk about the US Indo-Pacific Strategy. The onus is rather on individual countries to study it.”
What about accusations of a debt trap that China faces? “The BRI has been connecting maximum numbers of countries. It is not only a transport network but also an economic one. China takes into account what its neighbors want and offers help accordingly,” says Zhu.
She stressed that China is particularly interested in lifting Asian countries up. Speaking about Nepal, she said, “If Nepal plays its part well, the concept of trilateral cooperation between China, Nepal and India can succeed.”
Although India hasn’t signed on to the BRI yet, the Chinese are confident that the Indians will eventually come around. Senior Researcher Me Xinyu said, “China can move ahead only with the help of its neighbors and friends”. Citing the example of the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), he said, “Of the 22 projects, nine have been completed and 13 are in progress. The project has created 70,000 jobs for Pakistanis.” He said he was saddened by the negative publicity around the BRI projects in Pakistan and Sri Lanka. “There is such publicity even in Nepal. The problems arose not because of the BRI, but because of internal reasons in Pakistan and Sri Lanka.”
Qi Xin, Senior Researcher at the Institute of Economy and Trade Cooperation under the BRI, said trilateral cooperation between China, Nepal and India would provide an easy means for Nepal to pursue development. “Transport facility, fuel supply, free trade and infrastructure development will all improve if trilateral cooperation moves ahead.” Almost all Chinese participants said there would be no problems if Nepal deals with its two neighbors on an equal footing.
China seems hungry for global leadership and has embraced western ways to some extent
Although India hasn’t signed on to the BRI yet, the Chinese are confident that the Indians will eventually come around
Always a yam?
During the 1962 Sino-India war, India was concerned that Nepal was covertly supporting China. There were similar fears in 1973 when Nepal accepted Chinese aid for the construction of the Ring Road in Kathmandu. Westerners share the Indian suspicion that Nepal leans toward China. To dispel such doubts, some Chinese recommend that Nepal lay stress on trilateral cooperation, which they take as a part of the BRI.
During the last days of the Rana rule, in April 1947, US President Harry Truman had sent to King Tribhuwan a letter that explicitly recognized Nepal’s independence. At the time, India had the support of another superpower, the Soviet Union. Since that time, Nepal has been a geopolitical pawn in big-power rivalry.
Perhaps we can make the Chinese see that American presence in Nepal predates the start of the communist rule in their country, and Nepal will never allow its soil to be used for any anti-China activity. The Americans too could be more receptive to the idea of close cooperation between two age-old neighbors and the huge benefits that closer Nepal-China ties offer to a poor, landlocked country. The Indians, for their part, should be made to understand how serious Nepal is about trilateral cooperation and turning the country into a ‘vibrant economic bridge’.
Raute children studying to get jobs
Lalit Bahadur Budha, Surkhet
I witnessed a curious scene a couple of weeks ago when I visited a Raute settlement in Ratekhola in the mid-western hilly district of Surkhet. Sitting on a river bank, Raute children were learning Nepali alphabets. Some were sitting in a circle and singing “Kapuri Ka”, a famous children’s rhyme. A few others were writing. They were also learning English alphabets.
Raute children are fearful that their Chief might see them if they study near their settlement, so they go a little farther away to the banks of the Bheri River. “If our Chief comes to know about this, he will get angry. He tells us not to study but we have gone against his command,” says Birkha Bahadur Shahi sitting with his friends on the river banks. Nobody in Birkha’s family is literate; in fact, they believe studying is sinful.
'There was a time when our Chief used to disapprove of us wearing slippers. But now we are wearing shoes. Times are changing. Soon we will also get to go to school'
Dish Bahadur ShahiA Raute adolescent
Raute children, until some time back, used to get scared when they saw strangers. They hesitated to speak to anyone from outside their community. But with time they are becoming more outgoing and gregarious. Besides socializing with people from outside their community, these children are also keen on studying.
Two teachers have been assigned by the Social Service Center, an NGO, to teach the Raute children. “We are learning Nepali and English alphabets. Soon we will start learning numbers,” says Birkha Bahadur. “Eventually, I want to become a doctor. Or maybe a driver.”
Durga Khatri, one of the two teachers, says there has been a noticeable change in the children’s behavior since they began their studies. “They are showing greater interest in learning and are also more careful about cleanliness,” she says.
Raute children tell visitors about their dream of going to school and getting a job
As Rautes are a nomadic tribe, Khatri says she follows the children wherever they go. “But we have to persuade the Rautes to settle in one place, which will help get their children to school. It might take time, but it is not impossible,” says Khatri.
Deepak Shahi, a Raute teenager who cannot go to school although he wants to, says, “Now we need to study; otherwise we will not get jobs.” He talks about his dream of becoming his group’s leader when he gets older and the changes he intends to introduce. “When I become Chief, I will ensure all children in my group go to school.”
Every day, the Raute settlement attracts a number of visitors. While some go there just to take photos, others visit to learn more about the nomadic group. Children in the settlement tell them about their dreams of going to school and getting a job one day. People are awestruck when they hear this.
“Now it is hard to find game in the forest. And felling trees is strictly forbidden. So it is important that we study,” says Dish Bahadur Shahi, another teenager from the settlement. “I want to go to school and join the police force when I grow up. There was a time when our Chief used to disapprove of us wearing slippers. But now we are wearing shoes. Times are changing. Soon we will also get to go to school.”
Tornado survivors struggle to get back on their feet
It’s been almost two weeks since a windstorm wrecked havoc in Bara and Parsa, two districts in the central plains. House roofs blew away; crops were destroyed. Around 30 people lost their lives, and at least 1,000 people were rendered homeless. The poor endured the brunt of the disaster.
The victims suffered throughout the night of March 31. When they saw a helicopter in the sky, a ray of hope emerged. But the chopper carrying Prime Minister KP Oli did not land. Oli was there just for an aerial inspection. Unlike the chopper, aid did not arrive swiftly. Only on the fifth day were security personnel seen carrying out rescue operations in Bharwalia, one of the most affected places in Bara. In one small settlement there, seven people had lost their lives, dozens were injured, and yet no help was forthcoming for four days.
When help finally arrived, well-dressed aid workers were found taking selfies—even when victims were still crying next to their loved ones who lay dead. There was no one in the village to carry away the dead bodies. Now there is a steady stream of vehicles, big and small, ferrying in plenty of relief materials. Still, many victims are yet to get any help. There is a clear lack of coordination among government bodies.
“Aid has been politicized. Those with the right connections got relief materials from multiple agencies and hid them. But many real victims did not get anything,” laments Arjun Patel, a local of Bharwalia. Another local, Sunita Yadav, says, “It’s been many days since the disaster struck, but real victims are still without decent shelter. Despite a steady stream of relief materials, it’s sad that most victims are still having to spend the night amid the ruins of their houses.”
Every year, the country is hit by one natural calamity or another. In the immediate aftermath, there is plenty of talk about disaster preparedness. But the talk soon fizzles out. The same pattern repeats when the next disaster strikes.
The provincial government announced Rs 300,000 aid package for each family that lost a member
Everyone should do their bit in a time of crisis. But what we saw in Bara and Parsa was a political tug-of-war. “We did our level best. Several officials from Kathmandu flew in for a while but did not coordinate with us. Provincial officials showed a bit more concern,” says Amiri Lal Prasad, chairperson of Feta rural municipality in Bara. “We are sad with the federal government’s delay in timely rescue and relief. But we are also pleased that Nepal Army has been entrusted with rebuilding houses for the victims.”
But Chandra Kishore, a journalist who follows Madhesi politics, is not happy about army deployment for construction. “Isn’t this a purely civilian task?” he asks.
“We have three tiers of elected government now. But the federal and provincial governments failed to coordinate well with the local bodies in carrying our rescue, relief and rehabilitation operations,” he says. Chandra Kishore added that the provincial government was too focused on distribution and the federal government couldn’t resist the temptation to score political points. “The federal government should have declared a disaster zone and set up an office in Kalaiya [in Bara] headed by a federal minister. That would have helped get timely food and medicine to survivors.”
The provincial government announced Rs 300,000 aid package for each family that lost a member. Other political leaders announced financial help of their own, even as it remains unclear how this aid will be channeled to victims. The provincial government said it was disappointed the federal government did not declare a day of national mourning.